Legal Opinion
State v. Flohr
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1980No. Cr. 732PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
James P. Flohr, Sr., was convicted for delivery of an alcoholic beverage to a minor, § 5-01-09, NDCC. We reverse and remand for retrial.
The case was tried to a six-person jury in the Stark County Court With Increased Jurisdiction. Flohr now seeks a new trial for the following reasons:(1) That amendment of Rule 12.1 of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure was in this case ex post facto in violation of Article I, Section 10, of the Federal Constitution;(2) That he was denied his due process right to present defense evidence; and(3) That the court was “manifestly…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Taliaferro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Fargo v. StutlienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SevignyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.