Legal Opinion
Pope v. Parker
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 5, 1928No. 12,105PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison
Pope was defeated on the trial to the court of an action to quiet title, brought by him against Parker, and brings error.
The essential facts are that August 3, 1923, Pope made a contract with one Pelz to sell certain land to him. The contract provided for cultivation by Pelz and he agreed to pay the price to Pope in certain installments. Pelz assigned his interest to Parker as security for certain indebtedness due from him to the latter. Pelz then defaulted in his payments to Pope and' August 24, 1918, a new contract was made between them; Pelz further defaulted, Pope got a quitclaim from him…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Taylor v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Schilling v. RomingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- A. H. Andrews & Co. v. Colorado Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Danielson v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cahill v. ReadonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- American Mortgage Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Cavos v. GeihslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Grombone v. KrekelColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.