Legal Opinion

Butler v. Farner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 19, 1985No. 84SA205PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

The defendants, Richard and Goldie Far-ner, appeal Denver District Court rulings that the Forcible Entry and Detainer (F.E.D.) statute, §§ 13-40-101 to -123, 6 C.R.S. (1973 & 1984 Supp.), permits an accelerated trial setting, that the statute is constitutional as so interpreted, and that the defendants were not entitled to a continuance beyond the accelerated trial date. 1 We affirm the rulings of the district court.

On May 10, 1983, the plaintiffs, Gordon and Mary Butler, contracted to sell residential property to Goldie Farner for $125,-000, and Farner gave the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Friends of Chamber Music v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. People ex rel. V. A. E. Y. H. D.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Beeghly v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re the Interest of BlackColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API