Butler v. Farner
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
The defendants, Richard and Goldie Far-ner, appeal Denver District Court rulings that the Forcible Entry and Detainer (F.E.D.) statute, §§ 13-40-101 to -123, 6 C.R.S. (1973 & 1984 Supp.), permits an accelerated trial setting, that the statute is constitutional as so interpreted, and that the defendants were not entitled to a continuance beyond the accelerated trial date. 1 We affirm the rulings of the district court.
On May 10, 1983, the plaintiffs, Gordon and Mary Butler, contracted to sell residential property to Goldie Farner for $125,-000, and Farner gave the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Friends of Chamber Music v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People ex rel. V. A. E. Y. H. D.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Beeghly v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re the Interest of BlackColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.