Hunter v. Stump
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, C. J.
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that a decision of the questions presented by appellants’ assignment of error requires a consideration of the evidence, and that the evidence is not in the record; and further because the appellants have failed to make the marginal notations required by Rule 2-5.
An examination of the record discloses an entry showing the filing of a bill of exceptions on September 19, 1947. This is followed on the next page of the record by the certificate of the clerk dated the same day which reads as follows:
“I, Chester E. Guard, Clerk…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Walner v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. OestricherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- Rose v. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- GILKISON v. DarlingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Findling v. FindlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- State of Indiana v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Mellen v. KnottsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.