Legal Opinion
GILKISON v. Darlington
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1952No. 17,844PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, C. J.
— This is an action for injunction, filed by appellee Darlington, as a taxpayer of the City of Hammond, Indiana, in his own behalf and on behalf of the other taxpayers of the City of Hammond. The appellants are parties holding judgments against the City of Hammond, based upon the City’s liability by reason of its erroneous payment of funds received by it in payment of Barrett Law assessments, upon which bonds had been issued. Precedent for such liability was determined in the case of Read v. Beczkiewicz, Treasurer (1939), 215 Ind. 365, 18 N. E. 2d 789, 19 N. E. 2d 465.
It is alleged that said…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Indianapolis Life Insurance v. LundquistIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Bradshaw v. Probate CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Aetna Securities Co. v. SickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Webster v. BlighIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith, Peak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Stoner v. Howard Sober, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- WOODMAR REALTY COMPANY v. McLEANCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- City of Hammond v. DARLINGTONIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Registration & Management Corp. v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.