Rose v. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From Laporte Superior Court; Cornelius B. Collins, Special Judge. Action by the Chicago, Lake Shore and South Bend Railway Company against Paul Rose and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
Suit by appellee to condemn certain lands belonging to appellants for use in the construction of an interurban railroad and depot. Such proceedings were had as resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee, from which this appeal is' prosecuted.
1
Each of the questions which appellants seek to present, requires a consideration of the evidence given in the cause, but we are met at the threshold of the case by appellee’s contention that what purports to be the original bill of exceptions containing the evidence, is not properly in the record and therefore that no question is presented for our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guirl v. GillettIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Heberd v. WinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Rector v. DruleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Richardson v. DawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Raynes v. Staats-Raynes Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Findling v. FindlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Ogle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Hunter v. StumpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.