Legal Opinion
Weissmann v. Euker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The action is by an infant alleging that he was injured in a public school through the negligence of defendant Robert Euker, a teacher; and by the infant’s father alleging damages for medical treatment and loss of services. Only the father’s action has been dismissed at Special Term and he alone appeals; but the titles of the record and both briefs before us describe the infant as well as the father as *1 appellants ’ ’.
The accident occurred February 25, 1954, at the Harpursville Central School; and well within the ninety-day period prescribed by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Marsh v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Holland v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3New York Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Dutcher v. Town of ShandakenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Telephone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Kokoletsos v. SemonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991