Legal Opinion

Holland v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting the plaintiffs a preference and setting the case down for immediate trial, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Under the facts disclosed by this record, it is our opinion that the learned Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Order striking from the answer the second separate defense of the defendants Schwartz, and the first, second and third separate defenses from the amended answer of the defendants Baust and Abbington, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mintzer v. Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Schneck v. S. T. Grand, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Friedman v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Weissmann v. EukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API