Legal Opinion

Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1954PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFboessel, J.

Since the second cause of action in the complaint herein has been dismissed for legal insufficiency, we must assume the following facts to be true. Due to the negligence of defendant teachers, White and Mottola, plaintiff, a fifteen-year-old eighth grade pupil, was struck on the side of her face by a basketball as she was entering upon the gymnasium floor of a school operated by defendant school district. The accident occurred in the course of physical educational activities, when a girls’ basketball class was allowed upon the gymnasium floor while a boys’ game was still in progress. As a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Brown v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Winbush v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mills v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Titus v. LindbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Regan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Fitzgerald v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. GOODWIN, ROBETTE v. PRETORIUS, M.D., RICHARDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API