Legal Opinion

Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbennan, J.

In the first above-entitled action, the individual defendants, who are school teachers, move to dismiss the second cause of action (contained in the complaint in said first above-entitled action) on the ground that the complaint, on the face thereof, fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In said second cause of action, the infant, by her father as guardian ad litem, sues only the defendants teachers for damages for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of said teachers while acting in the discharge of their duties within the scope of their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Derlicka v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Metcalf v. Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Polk v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Schmid v. WernerNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weissmann v. EukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API