Legal Opinion
Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes Group, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 14, 1994No. 12219PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
In 1987, the plaintiff, Andrew Schick, filed a workers’ compensation claim after suffering a myocardial infarction claimed to be caused by on-the-job stress. After formal hearings, first district commissioner A. Paul Berte issued a finding and decision on June 5,1990, that the condition was not work related. Schick appealed to the compensation review board on June 15, 1990. In July, 1990, while the appeal was pending, Berte resigned.
In February, 1991, the plaintiff filed a motion to correct the commissioner’s findings, and, in March, 1991, filed a motion with the board for an order remanding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rullo v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Holcombe v. HolcombeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Stevens v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fantasia v. Milford Fastening SystemsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Gibson v. Keebler Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Quinones v. R.W. Thompson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019