Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 3, 1992No. (10981)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

This appeal arises out of a case that had not been concluded before the trial judge died. A successor judge then issued a decision. Because we conclude that the method by which the successor judge reached his decision was not proper, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for further proceedings.

This case involves a request to compel arbitration. The plaintiff claimed that he was a resident in his father’s household and therefore had standing to compel arbitration on the uninsured motorist portion of an insurance policy held by his father.1 The defendant insurance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bogaert v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Gaudet v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Divito v. DivitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Stevens v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API