Adkins v. Gillespie
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Dallas County Court; T. A. Work, Judge. Action by A. C. Gillespie against A. C. Adkins and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.
We extract from the briefs of the parties the following statement of the nature and facts of the case: On the 18th day of May, 1914, plaintiffs in error A. C. Adkins and W. A. Polk entered into a written contract with defendant in error, A. C. Gilíes- pie, for tlie exchange of lands. Adkins and Polk were to convey to Gillespie lot No. 1 in block No. 3 of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company’s addition to the city of Dallas. In exchange Gillespie was to convey to Adkins and Polk another tract of land in the city of Dallas, a description of which is unnecessary. It was provided that each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Heller v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Roberts & Corley v. McFadden, Weiss & KyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Brokaw v. . DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Barnard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Middleton v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Sweet v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Davis v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.