Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 24, 1926No. 2734PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
This suit was filed by ap-pellee as plaintiff against appellant as defendant ; the First National Bank of Lubbock being made a party defendant also as stakeholder.
Plaintiff’s petition contains two “counts”; the first count being an action for specific performance, the second an action for the recovery of $500 named in the written contract between the parties as liquidated damages.
Defendant Middleton answered by general demurrer to the whole of plaintiff’s petition; a general demurrer to the first count thereof; special exception, which in effect is a general exception that the first count…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Nixon v. New York Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Nixon v. New York Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dillard Homes, Inc. v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Blair v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Rabinowitz v. DarnallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Monarch Tile Sales v. Frost National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Willie v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.