Myers v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
Generally in this State communications by telephone are not admissible in evidence unless the identity of the party against whom the conversation is sought to be admitted is established by either direct or circumstantial evidence. Planters’ Cotton Oil Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 126 Ga. 621 (55 S. E. 495, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1180); Stewart v. Fisher, 18 Ga. App. 519 (89 S. E. 1052); Stamps v. Fruit Dispatch Co., 8 Ga. App. 503 (70 S. E. 84); Goodson v. Adams Grocery Co., 32 Ga. App. 419 (123 S. E. 748); Easterling v. Bell, 29 Ga. App. 465 (116 S. E. 50); Thompson v. Bank of Chatsworth, 30…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ayers v. John B. Daniel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Easterling v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Stewart v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Thompson v. Bank of ChatsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sossenko v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ProudfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Cannady v. LambCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Carmichael v. SilversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.