Legal Opinion
In Re Rose V
California Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2000No. S062859PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
The State Bar Court recommends that we disbar petitioner Mason Harry Rose V. Petitioner has sought review of that recommendation and contends we must issue a writ of review, hear oral argument, and render a written opinion before ordering the discipline as recommended. According to petitioner, our summary denial of his petition for review of the State Bar Court’s decision would be an unconstitutional attempt to invest the State Bar with judicial power, as well as a deprivation of his right to a judicial determination of whether he should be disciplined. Petitioner further…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Gadda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- In Re: Timothy L. Taggart, Debtor. The State Bar of California v. Timothy L. TaggartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.