Legal Opinion

Booth v. Hackney Acquisition Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 2017No. COA17-274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Judge.

*182 Individuals with latent health conditions are not members of a suspect class, and access to a claim against the North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association does not affect a fundamental right. The distinctions imposed by statute are subject to minimum scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause and do not violate the North Carolina or United States Constitutions, as they further legitimate State interests.

Thelma Bonner Booth ("Plaintiff"), as the administratrix of the estate of Henry Hunter Booth, Jr. ("Booth"), appeals the Full North Carolina Industrial Commission's Opinion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Booth v. Hackney Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. Booth v. Hackney Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API