Legal Opinion

City of Omaha v. Hodgskins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1903No. 13,069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

The material averments of the petition filed in this case are: That the city of Omaha is a city of the metropolitan class; that on November 10, 1899, December 20, 1899, April 9 and 12, 1900, respectively, plaintiff and her assignors paid to the city, under protest, certain illegal special taxes and assessments theretofore levied and assessed by the city against and upon the real estate owned by the plaintiff and her assignors; that, within thirty days after each of said payments, due demand was made in Avriting for the return of the same; that said payments have never been refunded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosenbloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Affholder v. State ex rel. McMullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. EwingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Chase County v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Misle v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kissinger v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 49 OF CLAY COUNTYNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. Stanton CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API