Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Eagles 2421 of Vermillion v. Hasse
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this declaratory judgment action, we hold that a video lottery lease was not effectively terminated.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] The Fraternal Order of Eagles #2421 (F.O.E.) of Vermillion, South Dakota entered into a written lease with Paul Hasse on September 6, 1989. The lease provided that F.O.E. would lease floor space to Hasse for installation of video lottery machines in return for Hasse’s remittance of a specified percentage of the net proceeds earned by the machines. According to the terms of the lease, it would automatically renew every four years unless either party…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Elwin K. Shain v. Washington National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- State v. FountainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matthews v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Hasse v. Fraternal Order of Eagles 2421 of VermillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Helleberg v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Duerre v. HeplerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- First Dakota National Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.