Legal Opinion
Matthews v. South Dakota Department of Social Services
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2012No. Nos. 25536, 25902PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Pooled Advocate Trust, Inc. (PATI), the managing corporation for a Medicaid pooled trust, brought a declaratory judgment action on Medicaid eligibility issues associated with the trust and named the South Dakota Department of Social Services (DSS) as a necessary party. The circuit court granted summary judgment and declaratory judgment for PATI. Fred Matthews and Gladys Matthews transferred assets to the pooled trust. When Fred and Gladys subsequently applied for Medicaid long-term care benefits, DSS imposed a penalty period because they were over age 65 at the time…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pitt-Hart v. Sanford USD Medical CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Center for Special Needs Trust Administration, Inc. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Poeppel v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Steven Lodis & Deborah Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Susan E. Cox and Edward A. Cox v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.