Legal Opinion

Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. Bushman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 36,605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

From decree of foreclosure of land contract defendant has appealed.

On June 15, 1920, the parties entered into an agreement by which defendant was engaged as loan agent of plaintiff for a period of years, and it is alleged in the bill of complaint and not specifically denied by answer that by and through said agreement defendant personally guaranteed all loans made by plaintiff through him, and further agreed to relieve plaintiff of any real estate taken upon foreclosure of any such, loan and to pay therefor.

A loan was made through defendant secured by mortgage on real and personal property,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silfver v. DaenzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Langley v. KirkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Daly v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonninghausen v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Walcrath Realty Co. v. Van DykeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ihlenfeldt v. GuastellaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Stover v. WhitingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API