Legal Opinion

Standard Water Systems Co. v. Grissom-Russell Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 2, 1922No. 2689PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Yew Jersey; Charles E. Lynch, Judge. Suit in equity by the Gris com- Russell Company against the Standard Water Systems Company and others. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

The Griscom-Russell Company, by its bill, charges the Standard Water Systems Company and three individuals with infringement of United States patent No. 1,131,738, issued to Reuben R. Row, under date of March 16, 1915, for an evaporator. It sets forth that' the apparatus of the patent was the invention of one of the defendants, who assigned the same to the Griscom-Russell Company. It charges that the said inventor and the other individual defendants, all three having been in the employ of the Griscom-Russell Company, left such employment and associated themselves with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dravo v. FabelSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Hansen v. SlickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  4. Coonrod v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson Laboratories, Inc. v. Meissner Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Premier MacHine Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  3. Buckingham Products Co. v. McAleer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Jacquard Knitting MacHine Co. v. Ordnance Gauge Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. National Cash Register Co. v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API