Legal Opinion
Johnson Laboratories, Inc. v. Meissner Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 1, 1938No. 6023, 6136-6138PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
The Johnson Laboratories, Inc., brought suit against the Meissner Manufacturing Company, for infringement of Claim 38 of Polydoroff Patent No. 1,982,690 and Claim 5 of Crossley et ah, Patent No. 1,978,568, both assigned to Johnson. The court held invalid Claim 5 of the Crossley patent and valid and infringed Claim 38 of Polydoroff. Each party, appealed from that part of the decree against it. The Ferrocart Corporation of America brought suit for a declaratory judgment under Section 274d of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, to determine the questions of validity and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- DeForest Radio Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Sandee Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Milcor Steel Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.