Legal Opinion
Town of Canterbury v. Rocque
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 2003No. AC 22518PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff, the town of Canterbury (town), appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing on jurisdictional grounds its appeal from the administrative decision of the defendant, Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., the commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner), placing conditions on the town’s application for permits for a municipal solid waste transfer station. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our discussion. On November 1,1996, the town submitted an application to the waste management bureau of the department of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Stepney Pond Estates, Ltd. v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dadiskos v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007