Legal Opinion

Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 4, 2007No. AC 27850PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The doctrine of mootness holds that before a claimed controversy is entitled to adjudication on the merits, it must be demonstrated that an actual controversy exists. In this appeal, we are asked to decide what role, if any, that doctrine plays in proceedings before the defendant freedom of information commission (commission).1 The plaintiff, the department of public safety, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its appeal from the decision of the commission, which granted the request of a newspaper reporter to inspect certain police records. We reverse…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Ethics Commission v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Marroquin v. F. MONARCA MASONRYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Ross v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API