Legal Opinion
Howard v. Navistar International, Transportation Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 3, 1995No. 93-C-894PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court is defendant Navistar International Transportation Corporation’s (Navistar) motion for summary judgment dismissing all the claims against it in the above-captioned action. For the following reasons, the defendant’s motion will be granted and this case will be dismissed.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Summary of Facts
In May 1986, plaintiff Ronald Howard has hired by defendant Navistar to work as a Drill Press Operator at Navistar’s Waukesha, Wisconsin machine shop. (Plaintiffs Proposed Findings of Fact (PPFOF) ¶ 36; Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Fact…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rodney Wayne Spath v. Hayes Wheels International-Indiana, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Weiler v. Household Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Humiston-Keeling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Hazeldine v. Beverage Media, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Soileau v. Guilford of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.