Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Singer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1989No. 375A88PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The question on this appeal is whether plaintiff is entitled to unemployment compensation. We conclude that she is and, therefore, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The evidence is basically undisputed. It shows that plaintiff had been employed by the Singer Company for more than twelve years. Although she commuted daily with her brother-in-law forty-four miles round trip from her home in Moravian Falls to the Singer plant in Lenoir, plaintiff had an outstanding work record with Singer. Plaintiff did not own a motor vehicle and was not licensed to operate a motor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Bingham v. American Screw Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Ross v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shuler v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. Watson v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Marlow v. North Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. King v. North Carolina Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API