Peebles v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.
Two cases, each involving a boundary dispute, were consolidated and tried before tlie circuit court without a jury; and from a judgment for the plaintiff in each case, the defendant, Leola Hall Peebles, has brought this appeal.
The rule of law applicable to both cases is as follows: ‘ ‘ Where there is a doubt or uncertainty, or a dispute has arisen, as to the true location of a boundary line, the owners of the adjoining lands may, by parol agreement, fix a line that will be binding upon them, although their possession under such agreement may not continue for the full statutory time. ”
SucIl…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Payne v. McBrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Robinson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Malone v. MobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Butler v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Harris v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Seidenstricker v. HoltzendorffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Sloan v. AyresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Stewart v. BittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.