Legal Opinion

Peebles v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1945No. 4-7644PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

Two cases, each involving a boundary dispute, were consolidated and tried before tlie circuit court without a jury; and from a judgment for the plaintiff in each case, the defendant, Leola Hall Peebles, has brought this appeal.

The rule of law applicable to both cases is as follows: ‘ ‘ Where there is a doubt or uncertainty, or a dispute has arisen, as to the true location of a boundary line, the owners of the adjoining lands may, by parol agreement, fix a line that will be binding upon them, although their possession under such agreement may not continue for the full statutory time. ”

SucIl…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Payne v. McBrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Robinson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Malone v. MobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Butler v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Harris v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Seidenstricker v. HoltzendorffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Sloan v. AyresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Stewart v. BittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API