Legal Opinion

Seidenstricker v. Holtzendorff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 1949No. 4-8739PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobiNs, J.

This suit originated in a dispute as to boundary line between owners of two adjoining tracts in Prairie county. Alleging that she was the owner of the fractional west half of section five, township one, north, range five, west, appellee brought suit in the lower court against appellant, who owned lands lying immediately east of her farm, asking that appellant be enjoined from constructing a fence so as to enclose part of appellee’s land and seeking damages for trespass already committed. She alleged that for fifty-five years there had been a well defined boundary between the two tracts,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Randleman v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Robinson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Tull v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Lammey v. EckelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API