Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Gaylord

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, 'O. J.,

(after stating the facts). This court has held in accord with the weight of authority that where there is douibt or uncertainty or a dispute has arisen as to the true location of a 'boundary line, the owners of the adjoining lands may, by parol agreement, fix a line that will be binding uponThem, although their possession under such agreement may not continue for the full statutory period. Sherman v. King, 71 Ark. 248, 72 S. W. 571 ; Cox v. Daugherty, 75 Ark. 395, 36 S. W. 184, 112 Am. St. Rep. 75 ; Deidrich v. Simmons, 75 Ark. 400, 87 S. W. 649 ; Payne v. McBride, 96 Ark. 168,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Payne v. McBrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Cutler v. CallisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Malone v. MobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. O'Neal v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Tull v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Peebles v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API