Legal Opinion

Green Bay Packaging v. Bartlett

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 1999No. CA 99-205PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Margaret Meads, Judge.

Appellant, Green Bay Packaging, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission which found that appellee’s headaches were a result of his compensable injury and that medical treatment provided for the headaches constituted reasonably necessary medical treatment for the injury. The Commission awarded accrued benefits to be paid in a lump sum without discount.

At the hearing before the administrative law judge (ALJ), it was stipulated that appellee sustained a compensable injury in April 1996; that the claim was accepted as compensable; and that benefits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Whaley v. Hardee'sCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Hill v. Baptist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Wackenhut Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Powers v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API