Green Bay Packaging v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Margaret Meads, Judge.
Appellant, Green Bay Packaging, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission which found that appellee’s headaches were a result of his compensable injury and that medical treatment provided for the headaches constituted reasonably necessary medical treatment for the injury. The Commission awarded accrued benefits to be paid in a lump sum without discount.
At the hearing before the administrative law judge (ALJ), it was stipulated that appellee sustained a compensable injury in April 1996; that the claim was accepted as compensable; and that benefits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Whaley v. Hardee'sCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
3Cited by18 opinions
- Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Hill v. Baptist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Wackenhut Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Powers v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.