Legal Opinion
Millan v. Restaurant Enterprises Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1993No. G012006PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
The Restaurant Enterprises Group, Inc. (appellant) appeals an order by the superior court compelling production of documents pursuant to an administrative subpoena duces tecum (subpoena) issued by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). The DLSE seeks to determine whether appellant is subject to California Labor Code section 227.3 1 , which prohibits tiie forfeiture of vested vacation time and requires the payment of accrued vacation time to employees upon separation from employment.
Appellant contends that because it maintained a Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Dep't of Indus. Relations v. UI Video Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.