Legal Opinion

Raske v. Gavin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1989No. C1-88-2017PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Earl Raske brought a legal malpractice action against attorney Michael Gavin and his firm, Gavin, Olson, Conkel, Ltd. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because appellant had not demonstrated the existence of a material issue of fact as to proximate cause. We affirm.

FACTS

American Bean Corporation decided to acquire a controlling interest in Midwest Bean Corporation in March 1983. At the time, Midwest Bean, a closely held corporation, had 600 shares outstanding. Earl Raske, Daniel Potter, and Lee Allen each owned 200 shares of Midwest Bean.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Vanderweyst v. LangfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Blackhawk Building Systems, Ltd. v. Law Firm of Aspelmeier, Fisch, Power, Warner & EngbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Lennon v. PieperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fiedler v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Bahram Yusefzadeh and Laury Yusefzadeh v. Burton G. Ross and Ross, Faulken & Rosenblatt, Ltd., a Minnesota Professional CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Fletcher v. ZellmerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  5. In Re Senior Cottages of America, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API