Legal Opinion
Fiedler v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1991No. C3-90-1774PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Susan and Joseph Fiedler, and Joseph A. Fiedler, P.A., appeal from a summary judgment against them, arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist concerning causation and damages in a legal malpractice action. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
Respondent, Michael Adams (Adams) provided legal advice, including financial and tax planning information, to appellants Joseph and Susan Fiedler, and Joseph A. Fiedler, P.A. (the Fiedlers) from 1971 through 1984. During this same period, Adams represented Metropolitan Bank of Bloomington (Metro Bank) in matters unrelated…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Whitney (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Bahram Yusefzadeh and Laury Yusefzadeh v. Burton G. Ross and Ross, Faulken & Rosenblatt, Ltd., a Minnesota Professional CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Gustafson v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.