Legal Opinion

Vanderweyst v. Langford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1975No. 44886PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a personal injury action involving an automobile accident, a head-on collision of two cars on a one-lane bridge, which occurred in December 1972. A district court trial was held, and the jury found by special verdict that defendant Michael J. Langford was negligent, but that his negligence was not a direct cause of the collision. The jury further found the negligence of plaintiff, Clara Vanderweyst, to be the direct cause of the accident. Plaintiff now appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment n. o. v. or, in the alternative, for a new trial.

Plain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Meurer v. JunkermeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Armstrong v. Industrial Electric & Equipment ServiceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API