Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided October 13, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CainWilliam B. Cain, J.
in which WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., and FRANK G. CLEMENT, JR., J., joined.
*329Landowners appeal the trial court’s denial of their Motion to Alter or Amend filed under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 59.04. The Motion was filed after a jury awarded $504,000 as damages for the condemnation of their property. The condemnation action was brought in the context of executing the “Phillips-Jackson Redevelopment Plan” drafted by the Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency (MDHA) and approved by the Metro Council. Landowners argue that the trial court abused its discretion by denying…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Stovall v. ClarkeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- CITY OF PIGEON FORGE, TENNESSEE v. RLR INVESTMENTS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
- Ex Parte Oscar Narciso Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- Ex Parte Oscar Narciso Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- Knoxville Community Development Corporation v. Orchard Entertainment Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020