Legal Opinion

Redburn v. Ferlitto

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1997No. C1-96-2063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay a portion of the judgment levied against petitioner, his client. We reverse and vacate.

FACTS

David Redburn (appellant) represented Roberta Ferlitto (petitioner) during dissolution proceedings against Anthony Ferlitto (respondent). Prior to the trial, respondent obtained an ex parte order directing petitioner to place $55,000 into appellant’s trust account. Allegedly, petitioner had taken this amount from the couple’s home and had not returned it. This sum of money was given to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapco, Inc. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Akin v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki, Below, Michelle L. MacDonald v. David Victor Rucki, Linda Olup, Esq., Elizabeth Henry, Esq., Jennifer Evans, Esq.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. Michael DoerrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Peterson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API