Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2007No. A06-1830Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Upon certification by the district court, appellant Philip Johnson challenges the district court’s denial of summary judgment in a home-warranty dispute, arguing that respondent Lisa Peterson failed to provide proper written notice under Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2006) and that respondent lacks standing to pursue the action because she no longer owns the home. Because respondent’s summons and complaint satisfy the statutory notice requirement and because respondent retained ownership in the home during the redemption period, we answer the certified questions in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API