Legal Opinion
Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1985No. C8-84-2149PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The appellants, who are detectives in the Hennepin County Sheriffs Department, appeal from a judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial. The trial court determined that the respondent union (L.E.L.S.) did not breach its duty to fairly represent the detectives when it negotiated the 1982 and 1983 collective bargaining agreements between the Sheriffs Department and the County. The court also held that the detectives did not have the right to a jury trial and that they could not properly subpoena the mediator from the Bureau of Mediation Services who had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pearson v. YewdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. McClentonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Pamela Maslowski v. Prospect Funding Partners LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Randall v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.