Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMinn v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1933No. 12,805Published

1DissentJustice Butleb

For reasons stated in this opinion, the judgment, it seems to me, should be reversed.

Laura A. McMinn sued Mark Harrison, claiming* that she, as mortgagee, has a lien-upon certain money, the proceeds of a sale by him of mortgaged property. The Davis Brothers Drug Company, a general creditor of R. H. and Helen A. McAtee and assignee of the claims of other general creditors, intervened and contested Mrs. McMinn’s claim. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Harrison and the drug- company and against Mrs. McMinn.

Mrs. McMinn sold a drug store to the McAtees. Part of the purchase price was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wells v. Schuster-Hax National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Morse v. MorrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Bogdon v. FortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Clark v. BrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  5. Peterson v. Bergman Cabinet Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API