Legal Opinion

Bogdon v. Fort

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1924No. 10,741PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This action is by the assignee of the vendor of five automobile carriages or busses which were sold to the Inter-City Automobile Lines of Denver, a corporation, and the object is a foreclosure, as chattel mortgages, of the five written instruments evidencing the transaction. Whether under the decision in Bailey, Trustee, etc. v. Baker I. M. Co., 239 U. S. 268, 36 Sup. Ct. 50, 60 L. Ed. 275, under a similar contract, that there is a real distinction between a conditional sale and an absolute sale with a mortgage back, and that the transaction there was strictly a conditional sale, is not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Martin v. Commercial Nat. Bank of MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  5. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ransom & Randolph Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Whiteside v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. J. H. Hincke Printing Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Glass & Bryant Mercantile Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Brug v. HerbstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API