Legal Opinion

Thomas Francis Callahan v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1964No. 349-62Published

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a former member of the Fleet Reserve of the United States Navy subsequently transferred to the Retired List, sues for those additional sums in retirement pay which he would have received from the time 6 years preceding filing of this action had he been credited with certain periods of constructive service for the purpose of determining his longevity increase. These periods, totaling 11 months and 2 days, have been properly credited for transfer purposes, i. e., in determining plaintiff’s eligibility for transfer to the Fleet Reserve. The question here concerns…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. White v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API