Legal Opinion

Bailey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1956No. 51-55PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff, a retired Army officer who was recalled to active duty, and who reverted to a retired status in 1946, seeks to recover, for the period from October 1, 1949 to date, the difference between retired pay computed with credit for his service on the retired list before his recall to active duty and the retirement benefits which he has been paid, computed without such credit.

The question presented is whether plaintiff is entitled to credit, in the computation of his retired pay under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, 37 U.S.C.A. § 231 et seq., the time…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Travis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Seliga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Phelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. J. Moran McGrath and Marion B. McGrath as Sole Heirs and Successors to the Property of James G. McGrath Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API