Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 3, 1961No. 217-56PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff claims that his retired pay, which commenced on August 1, 1955, should have been computed from that date at a rate higher than the rate actually used in its computation, and he is suing for the difference between the higher rate, starting on that date, and the rate he actually received. The Government says that the plaintiff did not become entitled to the higher rate until August 22, 1956, which is one year and 21 days after he retired. It says that his active service, plus other service made includible by statute, plus his time on the retired list, did not add up to 30 years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence McC Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Thomas Francis Callahan v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API