Legal Opinion
Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Local No. 105
Summit County Court of Common Pleas
Decided October 11, 1949No. 169512PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WATTERS, J.
The facts of this case are practically all agreed upon as an agreed statement of facts in the record or by written filed stipulations, which will not be set forth in full herein.
For the purposes of this decision these are the fact's as the court finds them to be:
The plaintiff is an employer or'proprietor barber working with the tools of the trade, and owns and maintains his shop at 780 South Main Street, Akron, Ohio. He is a member of the Associated Master Barbers and Beauticians of America. He employs as assistants from time to time other barbers, who are members of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Coons v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists International UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Iacomints Restaurant, Inc. v. Hotel Employees Local No. 118Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rainwater v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Nicholson v. Vending Machine Service Employees, Local Union No. 410-ASummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1952
- Dummermuth v. HykesTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1950
- Raleigh v. YankoSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1952