Legal Opinion

Raleigh v. Yanko

Summit County Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1952No. 184176Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WATTERS, J.

This matter was tried to the court on stipulated facts read into the record and upon other oral testimony or evidence, exhibits, etc. 'Plaintiff’s Exhibit “A” attached to the petition was admitted in evidence as a true copy of the agreement signed by the parties.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW.

The plaintiff union represents the waiters, bar tenders and similar employees, and the defendants, Nick Yanko and his wife, are partners, doing business as the Bubble Bar at 846 West Market Street, Akron, Ohio, where they conduct a restaurant and bar business, and have for many years.

On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Iacomints Restaurant, Inc. v. Hotel Employees Local No. 118Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1948
  4. Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Local No. 105Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API