Legal Opinion

Rainwater v. Trimble

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1950No. 17112PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The agreement between the union and the employer barbers as to the right to display the union card in their barbershops is plain and unambiguous. The employer barber agrees to abide by the rules of the union governing the display of this card — not only the rules in existence at the time he acquires the card, but all other rules as may be made in the future. The union having amended its rules governing the display of the card by requiring the employer barber to join the union in order to retain the use of the card, this was in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riviello v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International Union of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Local No. 105Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1949

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Journeymen Barbers' International Union, Local 687 v. PollinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. DiLeo v. DaneaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists, & Proprietors International Union of America, Local Union No. 205 v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API