Legal Opinion

Guy v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1948No. 6 Div. 601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellant against appellee for a specifically defined strip of land.

There was verdict and judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

Though in fact the case involved a disputed boundary line between SW J4 of NE i/4 and SE i/4 of NE %, Sec. 8, T. 21, R. 13, West, in Pickens County, Alabama, yet there was no disclaimer, but a plea of not guilty, and our statute, Title 7, § 942, Code 1940, was not invoked.

Defendant filed two special pleas setting up elements of adverse. posession, to which demurrers were interposed and overruled. We find…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Cooper v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Brantley v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Bynum v. GoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Turner v. De PriestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Watson v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Calvert v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API