Legal Opinion
Kong v. City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 2002No. B149322PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Petitioner Veisna Kong, doing business as Bartha’s Donuts, appeals from the order denying his petition for writ of mandate to compel the City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency to pay him relocation benefits. We reverse.
Statement of Facts
In February 1993, by way of assignment, petitioner became the sublessee of a piece of commercial property commonly known as 11913 Vá Carson Street in the City of Hawaiian Gardens (the premises). Frank and Dorothy Bartha (the Barthas) were the master lessees. Petitioner owned and operated a donut shop on the premises.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- San Gabriel Tribune v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Transdyn/Cresci JV v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Redevelopment Agency v. AttishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sacramento County Alliance of Law Enforcement v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.