Legal Opinion
Heidelberg Harris, Inc. v. Michael H. Loebach
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 1998No. 97-1553PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Michael H. Loebach appeals from the July 22, 1997, judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire granting summary judgment in favor of Heidelberg Harris, Inc. (“Harris”). The district court held that Loebach lacks standing to sue for patent infringement occurring pri- or to July 31, 1991, the date on which Loe-bach obtained legal title to the asserted patent. In a separate order, the district court held that Harris is a bona fide purchaser of a license under the asserted patent and therefore is not subject to suit for infringement of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Mora v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Filmtec Corporation v. Allied-Signal Inc., and Uop Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Delwood C. Collins v. Manuel Marina-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boeing North American, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. (Now Known as Aventis Cropscience Sa) v. Dekalb Genetics Corporation v. Monsanto Company (Now Known as Pharmacia Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Imation Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- TM Patents, L.P. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. v. DeKalb Genetics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.